James Cove of Planetski (a recent director of the SCGB, but since resigned as a member) has expanded his report on Frank McCusker's arrival. He claims ...
"One [candidate] withdrew after he felt he could not make the necessary changes."
[
www.planetski.eu]
There are varying views on the 'necessary changes'. McCusker aims to produce a club "relevant to all ages and types of snow sports enthusiast". If he's serious about this then the changes will have to be sweeping and radical and could put him in conflict with influential reactionary forces within the club. For some time now the SCGB has accounted for fewer than 3% of British skiers and (as discussed elsewhere) has very little involvement with Scottish skiing, which doesn't seem to have prompted many sleepness nights.
What percentage of the British ski population should a national ski club account for?
There has recently been an extensive re-branding exercise, and the SCGB is understood to have recently invested £100,000 p.a. in developing its website. The 2011-12 annual report (due in the autumn) will reveal the financial and membership results of this.
Meanwhile, thousands of British skiers and boarders are networking for nothing on ski sites such as winterhighland.info, snowHeads.com (which arose in 2004 directly as a result of the SCGB closing its public ski forum), snowboardclub.co.uk, j2ski.com and natives.co.uk
The concept of what people expect from a club, or whether they need a club at all (in traditional hierarchical form) is changing in the 21st century 'web 2.0' era.
It seems that all you need are level electronic communications and forums - skiers are well capable of informing each other (without formal 'information services'), helping each other and organising good days on the hills ... without being 'club members' as such.
Anyone got any membership trends of the Scottish Ski Club, for comparison?
Edited 1 times. Last edit at 08.37hrs Thu 31 May 12 by David Goldsmith.