Alan Mackay
Posts: 8939
Joined: Nov 1994
Last Visited: 15:01 24th May 2013
 
|
Re: Take the US example
Date Posted: 01.28hrs on Tue 26 Nov 02
There are many issues with regards snow making in Scotland, many which have been aired before on Winterhighland. Firstly there is simply the cost, not just of installation, but the opperating costs, if the Lecht blasted out their cannons at every possible moment, even when there was currently plenty snow, it would no doubt improve the reliability of cover, but would they have to increase ticket prices to pay for it?
One important thing to consider is that humidity is as important as temperature in whether snowmaking is possible. It might be -4 at CairnGorm and only -2 at the Lecht at the same time, and snowmaking is underway at the Lecht, but if CairnGorm had cannon's they'd be idle. The Eastern side of the mountains have drier air, and the drier the air, the higher the min temp for snow making. I have heard estimates that with the same technology, CairnGorm would only be able to make snow on about 50%-60% of the occasions that the Lecht can.
The situation is obviously more of a problem in the West at Glencoe and Nevis, which did try cannons, but gave up.
Undoubtly CairnGorm would benifit from even a small number of strategically placed cannons, and there is some capacity in the water system put in
for the funicular for future trials on the lower Cas / Zig Zags. Probably the area that would benifit greatest is the Top Basin, where the Ciste up-track and fairway could be topped up to help them last as long as, or longer than the gully side, it would also be an area that would not need much snow to be made if we had a snowless mountain, in a cold dry period. Another good option for such scenarios would be the M1 Poma and M1 Side Track, a well defined area that could be easliy covered, and help keep a vital access lift open.
Possible planning issues, with the National Park coming into effect during the 2003 season will make have implications on any snowmaking attempts on the 'Gorm, and certainly the cost of installation will be high to ensure minimal impact during installation, and the necessary reinstatment work.
With the exception of the Lecht the other big issue for the areas, is WATER!!! Why are you laughing!! Both in terms of storage issues, and in the fact that high up we only have small mountain streams which can not provide huge volumes of water for massive snow making operations. Taking all the water out of the water courses would not be acceptable ecological management by the ski areas. Thus huge snowmaking would require pipes and pumping stations to take the water from lower elevations, back up onto the mountain, this would make the system much more expensive.
There certainly is scope to go somewhere with snowmaking, but a lot of thought needs to be put into it. I think it would be better to go with a well thought out, possibly costly good system, than just to go in with a half baked adhoc scheme thrown together at minimum cost.
The one hope is the success of CairnGorm's funicular as a year round attaraction may unlock potential backing to fund further developments.
Of course longer term (well maybe not so long) we can always hope global warming brings the gulf stream screeching to a halt!! :-)
|