Snow making could have made a difference in keeping the Cas Gunbarrel and/or Zig Zags skiable to the mid-station instead of often running out 50 to 100yards away. Something that on the face of it doesn't seem to add much, but being easily skiable to the mid-station on fairly decent runs would make a big difference in getting bums on lifts.
Snowmaking shouldn't be discounted lightly, but there also needs to be a much more coherent and meaningful attempt to manage the existing snow resource - by that I don't mean just last gasp desperate patching, it requires a much more thoughtful and pro-active approach throughout the snow cycle.
Quote:
We ski on drifted snow in Scotland - and rely on deep gulleys to accumulate the natural snow. Snow cannons won't do much to aid this process - despite what others might have you believe.
Also rely on the snow-fences, yet some of those actually work against the existing natural snow fields. A lot of research went into the use of snow-fencing for highway protection in the US esp, we need to carefully consider how this can be used in our field, this might be the best weapon we've got in getting max gain for the least £s.
A modest investment in the new double fenced link made the difference between the M1 run being only open a few days all winter and being on of the more reliable runs of the past winter.
Trying to improve interlinking between runs and increasing flexibility of how runs are used, ensuring snowfences have gaps that can allow fence lines to be crossed, managing the snow resource can all help improve the situation. Snowmaking should not in my mind be so easily discounted from the mix, esp where it could make a real difference in sustaining key links that are not as snow sure as some long lasting runs.
More, possibly quite a lot more can be done, and quite a lot can be done by working smarter with what we've got without massive capital outlay.